In this week’s lecture, we learned about Math, Robotics, and
Art. As an art major I always thought
that technology was helpful to art but art was not helpful for technology.
After reading and listening to the lectures I believe that they go hand in
hand; they need each other to excel.
In the Mathematical lecture, I learned that math was very
helpful in art by making it more realistic when using perspective. This then
reminded me of the Gothic Architectural class I took; Robert Bork wrote about
how geometry was used and seen in everyday things and people. The use of
geometry was helpful in making the large Gothic buildings with very elaborate designs.
Bork also talked about Villard de Honnecourt, an artist who claimed to use three
point perspective in his sketches during the thirteenth century. His book of sketches is seen as a development between math and the arts to surpass the two dimensional way of thinking at the
time.
In the robotics lecture, I learned that technology and art
need each other and coexist together such as in computers, phones, kitchen
appliances and so on. Art inspires technology and technology inspires art, a
good example from lecture was the robot that was seen first in a theater play
and that led the sciences to create robots. This then made me think of how I
use technology and art in my everyday life; music. Music is a great combination
of the two because you need the mechanical structure to make the sound waves
that then creates music.
The creation of television is an outstanding example of math/robotics
and art coexisting and working together as one. It takes technology and science
to create the structure that then displays the arts on it.
After
looking at the two lectures, I did a little research and fond this artist named
Fernando Orella, who makes robots that make art. Essentially art that can make
art and I thought to myself, "who is the artist? The robot or the human
that made the robot?". This was very interesting because he also talked
about how these robots were given anthropomorphic traits to them. This then
brought me back to technology and the
humanities coexisting together.
1) "Sketchbook of Villard de Honnecourt Page XXXVI." Sketchbook of Villard de Honnecourt Page XXXVI. N.p., 11 July 2011. Web. 6 July 2014. <http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/architecture/honnecourt/xxxvi.html>.
2) Bork, Robert Odell. The geometry of creation:
architectural drawing and the dynamics of gothic design. Farnham: Ashgate,
2011. Print.
3) Vesna, Victoria. "Robotics pt2." YouTube.
YouTube, 15 Apr. 2012. Web. 6 July 2014.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAZ8bo9T_Pk>.
4) "." . N.p., n.d. Web. 7 July 2014.
<http://quezi.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/wide-screen-ces.jpg>.
5) "." . N.p., n.d. Web. 7 July 2014.
<http://craziestgadgets.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/iboo-ipod-dock.jpg>.
6) Henderson, Linda Dalrymple. The fourth dimension and
non-Euclidean geometry in modern art. Revised ed. : , 1984. Print.
7) "Fernando Orellana - Robot Art." YouTube. YouTube, 26 Nov. 2008. Web. 6 July 2014. <http://youtu.be/nuvW8cxAHNI>.
7) "Fernando Orellana - Robot Art." YouTube. YouTube, 26 Nov. 2008. Web. 6 July 2014. <http://youtu.be/nuvW8cxAHNI>.


Your reference to television was spot-on as a medium that fuses technology and the arts, and the little robot that plays music from the iPod is adorable (kinda want one now!). I liked the video you included of Fernando Orella's drawing machine, which is similar to the one I referenced from Eske Rex -- the fusing of art & technology seems to be something that interests a multitude of creators.
ReplyDeletePS: I thought it appropriate to mention the little prompt that comes up on Blogspot when commenting -- "Please prove you're not a robot" :)
ReplyDelete